From the cast, I don't think it's worth talking. The worst, however, is the way these guys died in the film: their deaths never sound credible and it is perfectly clear that it is all pretending. However, it worked out in its purpose: it shows in a harsh way the effects of a rape from the victim's perspective, and we can feel sorry for her and pity for the situation she is in. Controversial, the film was so harsh that even when it went to the theaters it received harsh criticism and some boycotts, even being withdrawn from theaters.
Finally, they have the idea of killing her, but the guy who should have done it was not able to actually do it, and pretended to commit the crime. The film has a long (the longest ever in a regular movie) rape sequence in which four men, one after the other, rape, insult and brutalize that young girl until she is unable to walk or to stand. But this nudity wasn't meant to excite or look sexy: is brutal.
It seems to me to be very much in line with the thinking and fashions of the Seventies, fertile in films with nudity and sexuality related themes. In fact, the film is quite difficult to watch and totally inadvisable for children, young teenagers or even more impressionable adults! The film's theme is the rape of a young woman on vacation in a rural place, as well as her revenge on whoever raped her.
In fact, the film is quite difficult to watch and totally inadvisable for children, young teenagers or even more impressionable adults! The film's theme is the rape of a This film has been around for a few decades but it has not become a classic, perhaps, because it's as shocking as it is. This film has been around for a few decades but it has not become a classic, perhaps, because it's as shocking as it is.
0 kommentar(er)
